Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Kurikulum Merdeka Compare Expository Text 1 and 2

TRIBUNPEKANBARU.COM - Simak disini Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Kurikulum Merdeka Task 3 Let’s Compare yang terdapat dalam buku Bahasa Inggris: Work in Progress untuk SMA/SMK/MA Kelas X .

Siswa diminta membandingkan Teks Ekspositori 1 dan Teks Ekspositori 2 dengan melengkapi tabelnya.

Sebelum melihat Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Kurikulum Merdeka , siswa harus terlebih dahulu menjawabnya sendiri, setelah itu gunakan artikel ini untuk mengoreksi hasil pekerjaan siswa.

Siswa bisa menggunakan Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Kurikulum Merdeka ini sebagai alat ukur kemampuan dalam memahami materi.

Bab ini menjadi salah satu sarana agar siswa memahami materi Chapter 5 Graffiti.

Langsung saja, inilah Kunci Jawaban Bahasa Inggris Kelas 10 Halaman 114 Kurikulum Merdeka Task 3:

C. Let’s Compare

Compare Expository Text 1 and Expository Text 2 by completing the table.

1. What is the author claiming?

Jawaban:

(Text 1)

Graffiti is considered art

(Text 2)

Grafitti is always vandalism

2. What reasons does the author use to support the claim?

Jawaban:

(Text 1)

- Graffiti enables the public to see something they may have never seen before

- Graffiti has the power to affect people positively

- Graffiti is an art is because of its uniqueness

(Text 2)

- Graffiti is something that one celebrates, if one is juvenile enough to do so

- Graffiti’s most salient characteristic is that it is a crime

3. What evidence does the author include?

Jawaban:

(Text 1)

- They can take a simple old building or any piece of art on the side of a building and turn it into a masterpiece by putting their mark on it

- People will stand and watch you paint for hours. Many times, they will stand and look, never once moving from their spots

- Graffiti can be made with many different materials, but its most common form is made by applying paint to a building’s wall

(Text 2)

- No institution that has celebrated graffiti in recent years like the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles or the Museum of the City of New York would allow its own premises to be defaced for even one minute

- Graffiti is committed without permission on another person’s property, in an adolescent display of entitlement

- John Lindsay, the progressive New York politician who served as mayor from 1966 to 1973, declared war on graffiti in -1972

4. What does the author say as the closing?

Jawaban:

(Text 1)

Thus, as part of the existing society, every person must strive to educate themselves of the origins of graffiti and how it has evolved to this very day

(Text 2)

In conclusion, there is nothing “progressive” about allowing public amenities to be defaced by graffiti; anyone who can avoid a graffiti-bombed park or commercial thoroughfare will do so, since tagging shows that an area is dominated by vandals who may be involved in other crimes as well.

( Tribunpekanbaru.com )